Economic Thought
Past issues
Economic Thought Vol 10 No 2
From ‘What New Political Economy Is’ to ‘Why Is Everything New Political Economy?’ ›
Reply to Arne Heise’s ‘The incommensurability of Keynes’s and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas’ ›
The Incommensurability of Keynes’s and Walrasian Economics and the Unsuccessful Escape from Old Ideas ›
Comment on John Davis’s ‘A methodological perspective on economic modelling and the global pandemic’ ›
A methodological perspective on economic modelling and the global pandemic ›
Economic Thought Vol 10, Issue 1
Popperian Hayek or Hayekian Popper? ›
Relevance of Chaos and Strange Attractors in the Samuelson-Hicks Oscillator ›
Learning to Treat Our Natural World Realistically Through Unlearning Mainstream Economics? A Commentary on the Recent Work of Peter Söderbaum ›
The Challenge of Sustainable Development: From Technocracy to Democracy-Oriented Political Economics ›
Economic Thought Vol 9 No 2
Comment on Abderrazak Belabes’ ‘What can Economists Learn from Deleuze?’ ›
What can Economists Learn from Deleuze? ›
The Self According to Others: Explaining Social Preferences with Social Approbation ›
Economics’ Wisdom Deficit and How to Reduce It ›
Consensus and Dissension among Economic Science Academics in Mexico ›
Economic Thought Vol 9 No 1
The Psychological Contributions of Pragmatism and of Original Institutional Economics and their Implications for Policy Action ›
Comment on ‘The Empirical Success of Keynesianism’ by Donald Gillies ›
The Empirical Success of Keynesianism ›
Wine and bottles. Some remarks on “The Two Blades of Occam’s Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic” by Giandomenica Becchio ›
The Two Blades of Occam’s Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic ›
Volume 8, No 2, 2019
Comment on Miguel Ramirez’s paper, ‘Credit, Indebtedness and Speculation in Marx’s Political Economy’ ›
Credit, Indebtedness and Speculation in Marx’s Political Economy ›
Orthogonal Time in Euclidean Three-Dimensional Space: Being an Engineer’s Attempt to Reveal the Copernican Criticality of Alfred Marshall’s Historically-ignored ‘Cardboard Model’ ›
Institutions, Policy and the Labour Market: The Contribution of the Old Institutional Economics ›
Hierarchical Inconsistencies: A Critical Assessment of Justification ›
Volume 8, No 1, 2019
Addressing the Malaise in Neoclassical Economics: A Call for Partial Models ›
Was Smith A Moral Subjectivist? ›
The Meaning and Future of Heterodox Economics: A Response to Lynne Chester ›
Judging Heterodox Economics: A Response to Hodgson’s Criticisms ›
Volume 7, No 2, 2018
Quantum Economics ›
The Lucas Critique: A Lucas Critique ›
Cherchez la Firme: Redressing the Missing – Meso – Middle in Mainstream Economics ›
A Common Misunderstanding about Capitalism and Communism Through the Eyes of Innovation ›
Volume 7, No 1, 2018
The Decline of the ‘Original Institutional Economics’ in the Post-World War II Period and the Perspectives of Today ›
Reassessing Marshall’s Producers’ Surplus: a Case for Protectionism ›
The Backward Induction Controversy as a Metaphorical Problem ›
Spiethoff’s Economic Styles: a Pluralistic Approach? ›
Volume 6, No 2, 2017
Comment on ‘About Waged Labour: From Monetary Subordination to Exploitation’ ›
About Waged Labour: From Monetary Subordination to Exploitation ›
A Quantum Theory of Money and Value, Part 2: The Uncertainty Principle ›
Cournot’s Trade Theory and its Neoclassical Appropriation: Lessons to be Learnt about the Use and Abuse of Models ›
Volume 6, No 1, 2017
Graphs as a Tool for the Close Reading of Econometrics (Settler Mortality is not a Valid Instrument for Institutions) ›
Ricardo’s Numerical Example Versus Ricardian Trade Model: a Comparison of Two Distinct Notions of Comparative Advantage ›
Bourgeois Ideology and Mathematical Economics – A Reply to Tony Lawson ›
The Signature of Risk: Agent-based Models, Boolean Networks and Economic Vulnerability ›
Volume 5, No 2, 2016
Complexity Modelling in Economics: the State of the Art ›
A Quantum Theory of Money and Value ›
Commentary on Jorge Buzaglo ‘Expanding Human Capabilities: Lange’s “Observations” Updated for the 21st Century’ ›
Expanding Human Capabilities: Lange’s “Observations” Updated for the 21st Century ›
Volume 5, No 1, 2016
The Methodology of Polanyi’s Great Transformation ›
Power, Property, the Law, and the Corporation – a Commentary on David Ellerman’s paper: ‘The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory’ ›
The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory ›
Commodities in Economics: Loving or Hating Complexity ›
Volume 4, No 2, 2015
The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Protectionism in Turn of the Century America ›
A Reflection on the Samuelson-Garegnani Debate ›
A Hayekian Explanation of Hayek’s ‘Epistemic Turn’ ›
A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà’s ‘Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf’ ›
Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf ›
Volume 4, No 1, 2015
Adam Smith’s Use of the ‘Gravitation’ Metaphor ›
Political Economy in the Eighteenth Century: Popular or Despotic? The Physiocrats Against the Right to Existence ›
Credit and Prices in Woodford’s New Neoclassical Synthesis ›
On the Renting of Persons: The Neo-Abolitionist Case Against Today’s Peculiar Institution ›
Volume 3, No 2, 2014
Reply to John Cantwell’s Commentary on Grazia Ietto-Gillies’ paper: ‘The Theory of the Transnational Corporation at 50+’ ›
A commentary on Grazia Ietto-Gillies’ paper: ‘The Theory of the Transnational Corporation at 50+’ ›
The Theory of the Transnational Corporation at 50+ ›
Reconciling Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage with Smith’s Productivity Theory ›
J.M. Keynes, F.A. Hayek and the Common Reader ›
Volume 3, No 1, 2014
A commentary on Alessandro Roncaglia’s paper: ‘Should the History of Economic Thought be Included in Undergraduate Curricula?’ ›
From Rational Choice to Reflexivity: Learning from Sen, Keynes, Hayek, Soros, and most of all, from Darwin ›
Adam Smith’s Natural Prices, the Gravitation Metaphor, and the Purposes of Nature ›
Economics as a Science, Economics as a Vocation: A Weberian Examination of Robert Heilbroner’s Philosophy of Economics ›
Volume 2, No 2, 2013
Economics and the Good Life: Keynes and Schumacher ›
Expectations-based Processes – An Interventionist Account of Economic Practice: Putting the Direct Practice of Economics on the Agenda of Philosophy of Economics ›
Adam Smith’s Republican Moment: Lessons for Today’s Emancipatory Thought ›
Volume 2, No 1, 2013
Volume 1, No 2, 2012
Volume 1, No 1, 2012
Visit the Economic Thought website »
Economic Thought, the online-based journal of the World Economics Association, is ready to accept article submissions from scholars working in the history of economic thought, economic history, methodology of economics and philosophy of economics. The journal welcomes submissions addressing all aspects of the aforementioned sub-disciplines with an emphasis on original and path-breaking research.
In line with the objectives of the World Economics Association, the journal seeks to support and advance interdisciplinary research that investigates the potential links between economics and other disciplines as well as contributions that challenge the divide between normative and positive approaches. Contributions from outside the mainstream debates in the history and philosophy of economics are also encouraged. In particular, the journal seeks to promote research that draws on a broad range of cultural and intellectual traditions.
Economic Thought is committed to openness in academic publishing and wishes to enhance the social and cooperative aspects of research. Once submissions have been vetted by the editors, those that fall within the journal’s remit and meet acceptable standards of professional quality will be assessed through the open peer review process. Papers of up to 8000 words (with named authors) are posted on the journal’s Open Peer Discussion forum (OPD) for a period of eight weeks in order to solicit comment and debate. The editors may also request further comments or reviews from experts in relevant fields. The editors aim to reach a decision on publication no later than 12 weeks after posting the paper to the OPD.
Read the submission guidelines
Visit the Open Peer Review forum
Co-editors
Eithne Murphy, National University of Ireland Galway
Constantinos Repapis, UK, Goldsmiths, University of London
Michel Zouboulakis, Greece, University of Thessaly
Managing Editor
Kyla Rushman
To contact the editors email ETEditor@worldeconomicsassociation.org
Board of Editors
Richard Arena, France, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis
Robert U. Ayres, France, INSEAD
Daniel W. Bromley, USA, University of Wisconsin at Madison
Bruce Caldwell, USA, Duke University
Victoria Chick, UK, Univeristy of London
David C. Colander, USA, Middlebury College
John B. Davis, Netherlands, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Jean-Pierre Dupuy, France, École Polytechnique and Stanford University
Donald Gillies, UK, University of London
Tony Lawson, UK, Cambridge University
Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Italy, La Sapienza, Università di Roma
Stephen Marglin, USA, Harvard University
Manfred Max-Neef, Chile, Universidad Austral de Chile
Deirdre McCloskey, USA, University of Illinois at Chicago
Erik S Reinert, Norway, The Other Canon
Alessandro Roncaglia, Italy, La Sapienza, Università di Roma
Irene van Staveren, Netherlands, Erasmus University